Monday, April 03, 2006

Codebreaking Colossus returns to Bletchley Park


Because it employed parallel processing to attack its problem, the Colossus machine was enormously powerful. Even today, a desktop PC would take a similar amount of time to crack a Lorenz key... It was the first ever programmable electronic computer, predating the American Eniac (Electronic Numerical Integrator and Computer) by two years.

A forgotten piece of history, brought back to memory by the sale of an original Enigma on eBay today. Bidding is still open, but it's up to $48,700 now with over four hours left.

Sunday, April 02, 2006

Assessing the Biological Weapons and Bioterrorism Threat


“For the past decade the risk and imminence of the use of biological agents by nonstate actors/terrorist organizations -- 'bioterrorism' -- has been systematically and deliberately exaggerated.” He immediately adds this practice “accelerated” after 9/11 and the mailings of powdered anthrax.

Because of the public and governmental perception that mitigation of allegedly catastrophic bioterrorism is of paramount importance , “the US biodefense research program appears to be drifting into violation” of the Biological Weapons Convention, an international arms control treaty which this country had an important role in building. It is a menacing development and has happened through a slippery evaluation process which justifies research into biological weapons threat capabilities and scenarios by repackaging what appears to be work with potential offensive application as defensive in nature.

BushCo. has been lying to us deliberately about the threat of "bioterrorism". This book, written by Milton Leitenberg for the Strategic Studies Institute of the U.S. Army War College, accurately describes the lies and concocted movie plot threats. It would appear the motivation is simple: this country wants to develop CBW agents, but we signed a treaty saying we would not -- a treaty that we developed and pushed. By claiming instead to be working on cures and vaccines we can actually work to develop the very agents themselves. The difference between offensive and defensive development is only semantic.